Is the Specification Pattern outdated now that Dynamic LINQ is available?

dynamic-linq linq specification-pattern

Question

Wikipedia states that the Specification Pattern is where business logic can be recombined by chaining the business logic together using boolean logic. With respect to selecting filtering objects from lists or collections it seems to me that Dynamic LINQ allows me to accomplish the same thing. Am I missing something? Are there other benefits to the Specification Pattern that should be considered as well?


Edit:

I've found some posts that discuss combining LINQ and the Specification Pattern:

Linq Specifications Project

Implementing the Specification Pattern via Linq by Nicloas Blumhardt (Autofac dude)

Has anyone gone done this road and did it become complicated to maintain?

1
7
9/21/2009 11:52:06 AM

Accepted Answer

Dynamic LINQ uses string expressions to allow the dynamic query construction. So we do in fact lose the type safety there. Whereas using wrapper patterns like the decorator pattern of it closely related incarnation, the specification pattern, allows us to maintain the type safety in code. I explore using the Decorator Pattern as query wrapper in order to reuse and dynamically build queries. You can find the article on code project at: Linq Query Wrappers

Or you can check my blog.

2
10/14/2016 2:49:09 AM

Popular Answer

I'm a C# developper and like to use the specification pattern, because it is closer of my business domain. Moreover, you don't have any surprise with this pattern, if a specification class exists, it should work. With Linq, your underlying provider maybe hasn't implemented some features, and you won't know it until runtime.

But definitively, the biggest advantage of specification over linq is to be closer to the business, it's a mini DSL. LINQ for me is a DSL for collection query, not for the business domain.



Related Questions





Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with Stack Overflow
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with Stack Overflow